Initialization of Volume management Failed

Initialisation of VVLIB failed

Started by Luis

Howdy, I've not found any answers in the forum for my trouble.
I take Win vii 64 bits, a lga 1366 mobo with Intel 975 and 2 hdd on raid 0 and 6gbs of Corsair platinum pc3 1600 ddr3 that soon will become 12.
I installed Ram Disk but at the finish of it it stopped while it was modifying the registry, the progress bar went almost to the end and stopped in that location. After a long while I closed the installation yet the program icon was present, I tried launching the program from it but a warning window opened saying "Initialisation of VVLIB failed". Closing this window would launch the program but with no options bachelor. I tried to uninstall the program but a warning window stated that the "unins001.dat file was corrupted". I then tried reinstalling with the exact same upshot. Delight tell me what to do or at to the lowest degree how to uninstall it. Thanks in advance.
Notation: I have noticed that later on this trouble happened Intel Processor Diagnostic Tool 64bit will not launch but was working fine before.

I am agape this issue isn't reproducible in our test environment. I guess something in your system prevents it from working correctly, though I am not sure what information technology could be.

Here is how you can completely uninstall it:

1. Remove the post-obit registry keys:

HKLM\Organisation\CurrentControlSet\Services\vvramd HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\SPVDPort HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\SPVVEngine

2. Remove the following files in the %SystemRoot%\System32\Drivers directory:

spvdbus.sys spvve.sys

3. Delete entire installation directory, usually in C:\Program Files\SoftPerfect RAM Deejay

four. Reboot.

Hi

I didn't observe the file \\vvramd , SPVDPort, SPVVEngine in registry keys but when I enter to\\ %SystemRoot%\System32\Drivers directory I didn't constitute spvve.sys and spvdbus.sys,

Thanks

patt

If you don't have those entries and files, it means either the product is not installed, or you are looking in a wrong location.

Hi Andrew,

Why the pop upward shows this message: Uninstall has detected that SoftPerfect RAM Disk is currently running.
It shown after I log on to window.

delight help.

Thanks in advance

If the installer says it's running, it'due south really running. You lot tin check in the Task Managing director for the procedure ramdiskws.exe or if there's an icon in the notification area (which may be hidden by Windows).

How-do-you-do Andrew,

Cheers for your help. Information technology is all done successfully.

Howdy, I had a similar problem with my Win10.

Tin't uninstall completely. Tried removing files as you mentioned.

one. Didn't discover: \\vvramd
2. Did observe the rest and removed: SPVDPort, SPVVEngine, spvve.sys, spvdbus.sys,

Withal, when I tried to delete the file on Windows Program, the message says "The activeness can't be completed considering the folder or a file in information technology is open in some other plan"

Please aid.

This may happen because Windows ten locks the app'south driver likewise as the app itself if it'due south running.

You can try starting Windows in safe mode, quit the RAM Disk app if it starts and and so delete the folder.

The same here on my Windows 10 estimator: I deinstalled the sometime version, delete registry keys and files, did it in safe mode, executed as administrator, ... nothing helps: always "Initialisation of VVLIB failed." Besides tried older versions (to become back my RAM disk), but nothing works anymore: initialisation of VVLIB failed.

About likely it's a driver signature validation result. Take a look at the file C:\Windows\Inf\setupapi.dev.log, if its terminal lines mention signature verification bug, that's the reason.

There is even so no known solution for this upshot, you can try disabling the driver signature enforcement before installing the RAM Deejay.

All of a sudden have Initialisation of VVLIB failed.
Had version iii.iv.7 on windows ceremony update for months without troubles, but suddenly afterwards reboot I got this.
Uninstalling and installing 3.4.8 did not help. Constant Initialisation of VVLIB failed.

It is unfortunately not.
What I did:
1. Uninstalled ramdisk
2. Rebooted with driver signature enforcement turned off
3. Installed again.
Subsequently reboot I get same mistake. Can nosotros discover and impale this fault? It is not just me being greed and non willing to pay $20 for dataram soft, I liked your soft and it was working well.

That really means information technology worked. Commuter signature enforcement is turned off only for one session. Then later y'all rebooted, it was on again.

I am not sure how to deal with that, perhaps disable secure kick, simply you exercise it at your ain take chances.

Disable secure kick is not a pick at all. Then is this meat that RAM disk is incompatible with windows x anniversary update?

It is not compatible with Windows x Anniversary Update where Windows was installed from scratch and secure boot is enabled. In that case it requires a Microsoft signature and an EV-certificate from us, which nosotros don't have yet.

Information technology is my case. Got it, thanks.

Any plans to obtain this certificates in hereafter?

May be adjacent yr. It costs around $500 United states per year and new headaches with a certification dominance and Microsoft

Hi Andrew

I have problem in my registry there is HKEY, no HKLM

HKLM is a mutual abbreviation of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE. It is explained in more details here.

Any change to the driver signature situation?

Nosotros have ordered an EV code signing certificate, information technology should be in place for signing in a couple of weeks.

Are you lot experiencing the same event where the RAM Disk'southward driver refuses to load on a new Windows 10 installation?

I am getting a BSoD at the terminate of the installation.

BSODs are a dissimilar story: it means something went really wrong, but not necessarily in our RAM Disk app.

When a system crashes with a BSOD, it unremarkably creates a kernel minidump in C:\WINDOWS\Minidump. Delight transport us the newest minidump file from that folder, and then we could have a wait at the issue.

Howdy

I am having similar issues when trying to upgrade from 3.4.seven to the latest version.

I have removed the registry entries, rebooted, removed the files nether system32\drivers, rebooted over again. And then I tried to install the latest one but the installation failed correct before finishing and prompted "The name is already in use as either a service name or a service display proper noun".

With launch the program option checked later on installation, the main screen is shown only all buttons at the top were disabled and prompted something similar "libvv failed/not loaded", etc. Now I could non go back to three.4.7 nor upgrade it. Please suggest

Thanks

This indicates one or both services are still installed. Attempt opening an administrator command prompt and type

sc query SPVDPort sc query SPVVEngine

If that'southward the case and either service is installed, try deleting information technology with the post-obit commands and reboot:

sc delete SPVDPort sc delete SPVVEngine

Thanks for your prompt respond. I will endeavor that when I have time coz the left over drive me crazy

And may I inquire if there is any performance gain in the new version, except those mentioned in changelog, similar faster init fourth dimension and zeroing ntfs etc? I inquire considering I have got around 5k read/write with three.four.vii, and I accept another ram disk app to mount a file epitome which can take 9k read if it's created in the virtual memory. But if it'due south created in phy mem, it'due south about 6k read. Why the difference is then huge especially when using virtual mem? PS I don't accept any virtual memory set in Windows, i.due east cipher vm/pagefile.

Thanks in advance

It is unfortunately hard to tell without knowing how the other awarding implements memory allocations. As far as I recall we were having issues with allocating big blocks (>iv GB) from virtual memory and decided to use the concrete one. Though if the other awarding performs better for y'all, why non just utilize it?...

Yep I remember reading somewhere that at that place might be bug when it's > 4gb, merely it'southward fine for me since mine is less than 4gb.

Regarding which awarding to use, well information technology depends on what I/you lot/a user demand. Your RAM Disk definitely has advantages over others in some areas and others too - that's why I use both , it may be just my preference only I love SoftPerfect RAM Disk and accept been using it for a long time.

Pages: i2

Respond to this topic

simpsonmyrand2001.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.softperfect.com/board/read.php?16,20258

Share this post